Compliance
Last updated 8 September 2026
Draft pending legal and compliance review. This page describes an intended compliance posture and has not yet been verified against the programme as operated. Every statement must be confirmed accurate before publication — describing controls that are not in place would be worse than saying nothing.
We work with sectors other providers decline. That only works if the underwriting behind it is serious. This page describes how we approach financial crime compliance and what we expect from merchants.
1. Regulatory framework
Payments in Brazil operate inside a well-defined regulatory perimeter. The framework most relevant to our activity includes:
- Law No. 9.613/1998, as amended, which establishes Brazil's anti-money-laundering regime and the obligation to identify customers, keep records and report suspicious activity.
- Law No. 12.865/2013 and the resolutions of the Banco Central do Brasil (BCB) and the Conselho Monetário Nacional, which govern payment institutions and payment arrangements.
- BCB rules governing Pix and the SPI, including the operating regulation and the requirements applying to participants and their customers.
- COAF regulations on reporting suspicious and cash-related operations.
- Law No. 13.709/2018 (LGPD) on the processing of personal data.
- International sanctions obligations, and the standards of the Financial Action Task Force as reflected in Brazilian law.
Where we route transactions through a Banking Partner, that institution's own regulatory obligations also apply to your account. Our onboarding is designed to satisfy both our requirements and theirs, which is why we ask for documentation in the form they expect.
2. Our AML and CFT programme
We operate a risk-based programme covering customer identification and verification, risk assessment and classification, ongoing due diligence, transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, suspicious activity reporting, record keeping, staff training and independent review. Risk is assessed on the sector, jurisdictions, ownership, product mix, expected volumes and distribution model of each merchant, and determines the depth of diligence applied and the frequency of review.
3. Merchant due diligence
Before a merchant can transact, we complete know-your-business checks. Depending on risk these cover:
- Legal existence and good standing — incorporation documents, registration number, registered address, articles of association.
- Ownership and control — the corporate structure up to ultimate beneficial owners, and identification of directors and authorised representatives.
- Identity verification of individuals, with documentary evidence and address confirmation.
- Licensing — evidence of authorisation in each market where the activity requires it.
- Business model — what is sold, to whom, in which countries, how it is marketed, and the refund and cancellation terms offered.
- Financial profile — expected volumes and transaction sizes, processing history, prior provider relationships and chargeback performance.
- Adverse media, litigation and regulatory action.
Enhanced due diligence applies where risk is higher — for example complex or opaque ownership, higher-risk jurisdictions, PEP involvement, or a sector with elevated chargeback or fraud exposure. We may decline an application, and we may decline without giving detailed reasons where explaining would prejudice a legal or regulatory obligation.
4. How we underwrite high-risk sectors
CFD and trading platforms are our core book. We treat them as a sector with specific, well-understood risks rather than as an exception to be handled case by case, which is what makes it possible to support them consistently.
- Licensing is the first question. We look at where you are authorised, which clients you are permitted to serve, and whether your marketing matches that permission.
- Client-money handling matters. How deposits are held, segregated and returned tells us a great deal about how a platform is run.
- We look at conduct, not just structure — how the product is advertised, what risk warnings are shown, how withdrawals are processed and how complaints are handled.
- Chargeback and dispute performance is monitored against Banking Partner and scheme thresholds, with remediation required before limits are breached.
- Documentation is prepared for the partner. A file assembled the way a Brazilian banking partner expects it is a large part of why an application succeeds.
Supporting a sector is not the same as supporting every business in it. We decline businesses whose licensing, conduct or transparency does not meet the standard our Banking Partners require.
5. Sanctions and PEP screening
We screen merchants, their beneficial owners, directors and authorised representatives against applicable sanctions and watchlists at onboarding and on an ongoing basis, and we screen for politically exposed persons and close associates. Screening covers the lists we are required to apply and those our Banking Partners require, including United Nations and applicable national and regional regimes.
A positive match is reviewed before any action is taken. Where a genuine match is confirmed, we will not onboard the merchant, or will suspend an existing relationship, and will make any report the law requires. PEP status does not automatically mean refusal; it triggers enhanced due diligence and senior approval.
6. Transaction monitoring and reporting
Transactions are monitored for patterns inconsistent with the merchant's expected profile — unusual volumes or velocity, structuring, mismatches between stated and observed business activity, unexpected counterparties or geographies, and indicators of transaction laundering.
Alerts are reviewed by our compliance function. Where review does not resolve a concern, we report to COAF within the timeframes set by law. Brazilian law prohibits tipping off: we will not tell a merchant that a suspicious activity report has been made. A merchant may be asked for further information, or may have activity restricted, without being given the reason.
7. Record keeping
We retain identification records, due diligence files, transaction data and the supporting documentation for our reports for the minimum periods required by Brazilian anti-money-laundering and payments legislation, calculated from the end of the relationship or the date of the transaction, and for longer where an investigation, audit, regulatory request or legal claim requires it. Retention continues after a merchant relationship ends, and a request to delete data does not override it.
8. Governance and training
Responsibility for the compliance programme sits with a designated officer with direct access to senior management. Staff receive training on financial crime, sanctions, data protection and confidentiality when they join and periodically thereafter, proportionate to their role. Policies are reviewed at least annually and whenever there is a material change in law, in our Banking Partner arrangements, or in the risks we face.
9. Data protection
Compliance processing involves personal data, and it is handled under the LGPD like any other processing we carry out. Where we process data to meet an anti-money-laundering obligation we act as controller and rely on compliance with a legal obligation as our basis, which means some data subject rights — deletion in particular — are limited. Our Privacy Policy explains this in full.
10. Regulatory and law enforcement requests
We respond to lawful requests from the Banco Central do Brasil, COAF, tax authorities, courts and law enforcement. We check that a request is valid and properly served, provide only what is required, and keep a record of what was disclosed. Where we are legally permitted to notify the merchant, we do; frequently we are not.
Requests should be directed to operations@inovanexo.com.
11. Reporting a concern
If you believe an account is being used for fraud, money laundering or any other unlawful purpose, tell us at operations@inovanexo.com. Reports can be made anonymously. We investigate every report and do not tolerate retaliation against anyone who raises a concern in good faith.